Why “Power or Powerless”?

I woke up this morning in New York - I’m here for the Webby Awards this evening, and to start the day I tuned into a debate that was happening courtesy of the Birmingham Post, back home in the UK.

The subject was “Power or Powerless” in terms of how digital media is changing and affecting us.

It was interesting to see it happening streamed via Bambuser, discussed on Twitter and liveblogged on the Birmingham Post site and there’s been some good discussion coming out of it

Nick Booth talks about how perhaps we should be looking to the terms ‘useful’ and ‘useless’ rather than focussing on the potential ‘power’ digital tools and media offer us.

Terms like ‘power’ and ‘usefulness’ are in themselves interesting ways to look at what’s happening with ‘digital’.

I guess the big thing that is still always missing from debates like this is the the big ‘why?’.

If you have increased ‘power’ as an individual (or was it as a business? I was confused) then what would you use it for?

And if we’re saying that we’re really interested in ‘usefulness’ (was this really just about entertainment and news as the panel seemed to be suggesting) then what is the thing that we are trying to achieve.

From my end - I was in NYC with a little audio timelag - the debate seemed to be a little unfocussed on these issues, and went off on a few tangents.

I’d like to see a very simple debate run with some other kinds of thinkers, who aren’t necessarily running business that heavily depend on ‘digital’ or ‘media’ as their core activity.

I’m thinking poets, philosophers - people from the cultural sector to give a more human perspective on these issues. Grandparents, people living outside the UK, young people… something a little bit different than the usual mix of ‘digital media industry professionals’.

And a few suggestions for the next event like this:

* Assume a level of knowledge - don’t start from Social Media 101 level at the next event. Let’s get into some gritty details here but not on a geeky technical level and assume people paid attention to this one.

* Keep it on topic. No discussions about micropayments for record companies - that’s not the core issue unless I’ve misunderstood.

* Involve the online audience more and allow for interesting stuff to come out of the online experience. Allow us a more rich online space - perhaps some kind of whiteboard?

* Have a strong outcome - what are we answering and what happens next? What are the URLs to follow afterwards? What is the outcome and what can we expect?

All in - it was nice to see this happening and it’s a shame I was in the states for it, and what’s great is that the Post got so much _right_. I’m hoping there’s more to come.

For me, the outcome was that my question that I posted on the liveblog was ( or perhaps wasn’t - and that’s the point) answered by the panel:

“Digital: Power or Powerless” was the title of this talk. Can each panelist give one example of ‘digital’ that has made us powerless?

The sound suddenly went down for me at that point, but looking at the video and the liveblog it seemed like the only examples that came through were about potentially damaged business models rather than digital media disempowering people. I’d probably take issue with that in terms of how whole economies in the worlds are being run on ‘knowlege’ nowadays, so countries in which the digital revolution is still yet to happen in a widespread way could potentially be seen as being massively disadvantaged. There are also huge issues with language in that having excellent English is the accepted ’starter for ten’ for being at the forefront of a lot of new web technologies. There are more, but it was a shame there wasn’t more discussion around those issues because _that’s_ the debate that’s needed at the moment.

We’ve got the ‘what’ (digital stuff), we seem to have some of the ‘how’ (some of the tools and platforms that use the digital stuff), but there’s no forum to be talking about the ‘why?’ (what are we going to use it for, then? now that we have all this technology freely available what do we want to do with it and why?)

I think there’s an opportunity for an event right there.

So how about it - a BarCamp with a theme of “Why?” Perhaps around the weekend of the large digital event that’s soon to be announced for later this year?

Zemanta Pixie

3 Comments

  1. June 10, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Interesting - and spot on. For our digital stock photography business I don’t want to hear from ‘digital media industry professionals’ about cool tools that can be added to our web site, I want to hear from customers about how they would like things improved. Are they going to want to see the business on Facebook - no - are they going to want new photographic updates to the library sent to their desktop via RSS feeds - yes.
    We do really need to ask ‘why?’ would we want some of these new tools. OK, that is just my business perspective. Rant over.

  2. June 10, 2008 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the mention. I was quoting the useful and useless idea from the ever incite-ful Dave Harte:

    http://blogs.birminghampost.net/business/2008/06/social-medias-hidden-legacy.html

    The Big Debate got me thinking about where the digital divide really sits. It is not about access to the internet or equipment. I was blogging that those who will find themselves on the right side of the divide are those rich in social capital. It is essentially the same as other economic divides.

    Congrats on last nights webby award.

  3. June 10, 2008 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the hat-tip here Nick and on your won <a href="http://www.podnosh.com/blog/2008/06/09/bridging-the-digital-divide-is-about-strengthening-human-networks-not-internet-access/" rel="nofollow">blog</a>. The useless/useful thing wasn’t quite the thing I thought would be picked up actually. It was literally about what’s not being revealed by our use of social media. And when something’s not revealing itself that makes one think about how power relationships work and as we’re at the start of the whole social media thing we have a real chance to examine those power relationships.

    How power works through the media is of course a rich area of study for media academics. I’m kinda surprising myself that I find it so interesting (having stepped sideways from the academic stuff for a while).

    Few further thoughts in the <a href="http://daveharte.com/creative-industries/social-medias-hidden-legacy/#comments" rel="nofollow">comments of my own blog</a>.

One Trackback

  1. [...] Stef [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*